QWEN CHAT API DEMO DISCORD It is widely recognized that continuously scaling both data size and model size can lead to significant improvements in model intelligence. However, the research and industry community has limited experience in effectively scaling extremely large models, whether they are dense or Mixture-of-Expert (MoE) models. Many critical details regarding this scaling process were only disclosed with the recent release of DeepSeek V3. Concurrently, we are developing Qwen2....

Tech Report HuggingFace ModelScope Qwen Chat HuggingFace Demo ModelScope Demo DISCORD Introduction Two months after upgrading Qwen2.5-Turbo to support context length up to one million tokens, we are back with the open-source Qwen2.5-1M models and the corresponding inference framework support. Here’s what you can expect from this release: Opensource Models: We’re releasing two new checkpoints, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-1M and Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-1M, marking the first time we’ve upgraded our opensource Qwen models to handle 1M-token contexts....

QWEN CHAT GITHUB HUGGING FACE MODELSCOPE DISCORD We release Qwen2.5-VL, the new flagship vision-language model of Qwen and also a significant leap from the previous Qwen2-VL. To try the latest model, feel free to visit Qwen Chat and choose Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct. Also, we open both base and instruct models in 3 sizes, including 3B, 7B, and 72B, in both Hugging Face and ModelScope. The key features include: Understand things visually: Qwen2....

GITHUB HUGGING FACE MODELSCOPE DISCORD Background The Mixture-of-Experts (MoEs) architecture has become a popular model-parameter-scale-up technique. Typically, one MoE layer consists of a router (often parameterized as one single Linear layer) and a group of experts (for transformer-based models, each expert is one feedforward layer). Given an input, only a subset of experts will be activated, and then their outputs will be aggregated based on the scores the router assigned....

GITHUB HUGGING FACE MODELSCOPE DISCORD Introduction In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have made remarkable advances in mathematical reasoning, yet they can make mistakes, such as miscalculations or logical errors, leading to wrong conclusions. Moreover, even when achieving correct final answers, these powerful models can still regularly make up plausible reasoning steps, where the final answers build upon flawed calculations or derivations, which undermine the reliability and trustworthiness of LLMs’ reasoning processes....